I reread this chapter because many questions have arisen
lately about guided reading at our school.
Routman makes a few points clear from the very beginning. First, guided reading is just another way to
support our readers and should not overtake our reading block. As part of the
optimal learning model, guided reading can simply be a follow up on the read
aloud or the shared reading. This
reminds me of the mini-lesson in reading workshop when we share a strategy or
focus lesson and then release the students to their reading in order to apply
it. Pulling small groups in at that time
would allow a teacher to listen in and monitor the students understanding and
ability regarding the task at hand instead of just releasing them and assuming that
they got it. Taking your struggling
readers in on a daily basis is definitely recommended but this does not have to
be according to their reading level.
Instead Routman encourages heterogenous groupings so that student do not
get stuck in the same group all year long.
I completely agree with her on this which is why I’m a huge fan of book
clubs especially in the intermediate grades.
Forming groups based on interests or differentiated needs that have come
to light through formative assessments allows students the flexibility and the
opportunity to participate with confidence while getting appropriate support
and keeps engagement high.
In addition, guided reading instruction should be
implemented with flexibility. As stated
previously, small groups should be based on students’ needs not levels. I do love that she encouraged teachers to
release the students from the small group as they were able to comprehend or
complete the task successfully. No more
strapping them to the kidney table for their allotted time! The wonderful thing is even though they are
released, they are not done. She sends
them off to reread the text or go forward in the text and continue to problem
solve. Her lingering support using the
whiteboards and the targeted task provides the guidance that they need as they
work on their own. That work is the
student’s priority, who then can read independently or work on a literacy
project afterwards. That is definitely
my idea of an effective, supportive reading block. No stations, or centers, or worksheets, or
rotation madness, just reading and writing according to the students’ needs and
interests.
Finally, I did appreciate that Routman encouraged some
written response to go along with guided reading. I do agree that too much writing can take the
joy out of reading. However, some
writing to record thoughts and responses to the text helps not just in
accountability but in discussions. I prefer
my students to be able to discuss what they’ve read and writing their thoughts
helps them to do that.
Most of all, I think that it is important to remember that
guided reading gives students support as the teacher “encourages problem solving,
observe what students do, and teach what’s needed.” All of this begins with truly knowing your
students and monitoring their progress.
The purpose is as always, to help them become independent readers
whether they are in the guided group or working on their own. Routman has high expectations for students
during this part of literacy instruction as just one component of the optimal
learning progression that is needed in all classrooms.
So true--"struggling reader" is not determined simply by a reading level. In different ways, we are all struggling readers--we need more practice to get better! I agree that the good ol' reading and writing times are what should be our focus, and sometimes our worksheets/centers aren't working on reading/writing as much as we think they are.
ReplyDelete"
ReplyDelete"Finally, I did appreciate that Routman encouraged some written response to go along with guided reading. I do agree that too much writing can take the joy out of reading. However, some writing to record thoughts and responses to the text helps not just in accountability but in discussions. I prefer my students to be able to discuss what they’ve read and writing their thoughts helps them to do that."
Katrina-- your response in this section really spoke to me. I agree, just like is stated through many of these articles/chapters that we are reading for this course, that too much writing about what the students are reading takes some of the joy out of reading and being able to get "lost" in your book. This is where I like to just use small post-it notes as they are reading to "jot" down a thought/skill, etc. Then when we discuss it, they can refer to their post-it notes. A lot of times, I just have an anchor chart for the skill that we've been focusing on, and after they finish reading, they come up and put their post-it notes on the anchor chart, then I read them as a summarizing activity, or save them for the next day and read them as an activating strategy.
I totally love the sticky note approach to hold their thoughts, preparation for sharing, anchor charts for thinking. Using them for assessment is the next step so that we scrounge up something else in order to get a grade.Using what we already do and value is the key to some sanity. Ah, sweet, sweet, sanity!
ReplyDelete