Teaching comprehension can be hard.
I mean, after all, how do you really teach understanding? I think that I am
probably guilty of teaching those comprehension strategies in isolation. I’d
like to think that I’m not, and I do remind my students that “good readers are
using a lot of different skills at once” – but truth be told, I’m definitely
still isolating skills. I took quite a bit away from this chapter. Routman
mentions how we are teaching our students to be superficial readers and we
aren’t really digging into the analytical thinking about texts. This made me
think about my high school and college literature classes. I adored those
classes because I deeply enjoyed analyzing all aspects of the books we read. We
would spend days and weeks just talking about a book, and from those discussions,
I always felt like I walked away a more analytical thinker. I never felt that
way after just having a simple Q&A session on the plot, setting, conflict,
main character. Perhaps the key to some of that deeper thinking for our
students is not necessarily in each of those strategies, but in the depth of
our discussions surrounding the text.
I also liked what Routman said
about explicit instruction and application time. The 20% and 80% rule made
sense to me. I’m really trying this in my classroom this year (among all of the
other things that I’m trying). I typically like to do literacy centers, but if
our whole group instruction time runs long, then we just do independent/guided
reading time because I am refusing to sacrifice their reading time this year.
I’m trying to teach my students that this time is sacred. But I do have a
confession to make… I’m scared that while my students are reading
independently, they’re not actually using the skills or strategies that we
talked about. I have them use sticky notes sometimes, I conference and have
guided reading. However, I’m always wondering if that student over there
reading is actually applying the new strategies. I can’t always be right there,
and I can’t always be in their head or ear to make sure that they are.
I really liked the try it and apply
it section of this chapter. I’m looking forward to trying some of these things
and reworking some of my long and short range plans to include them. I found
these to be great ideas, and they were super clear and simple.
I think you hit on something---discussions! I love having discussions about reading and Serravallo's book reveals a way to assess these conversations. Maybe trying this little tweak can help your students go deeper and you to see that they are applying what they have learned.
ReplyDeleteI love, love, love your realization that maybe conversations are where we enter into those deeper levels of comprehension! :-)
ReplyDelete